Thoughts/Interpretations/Impressions about Marriage, Family in relation to culture

in that respect can be thousands of interpretations, thoughts and impressions about family, marriage, kinship and marital residence depending on who is doing it and the background from which one has been brought up. moreover both the views argon rattling vexing and sometimes debatable. In my interpretation, marriage, kinship and family have altered trends of vitality in m whatsoever cultures, especially where there have been intercultural or intertribal marriages. These variants of marriage have savant galore(postnominal) societies about changing roles of men and women.It is a good trial that has passed the test when women from fresh(prenominal) cultures do duties that have been associated with men and surprisingly the cultural beliefs that have prohibited women from these duties have been abanthroughd. Women around the public argon great and respected leaders, for instant many African cultures atomic number 18 too tough but view for the first time in the continent (in L iberia) a woman has been elected president. This is a rattling irrefutable sign about rigid cultures that are changing. In some nations racial segregation is rampant.This phenomenon is in man because of diverse practices or cultures and the languages which play vital roles in many cultures. This denotes the danger of extremism or total communion of culture. This is when slew feel outsiders have invaded their culture and it will be a threat to their identity as s group. Strong adherence to culture may divide a society or has already divided many a societies. Indeed many nations in the world have been divided along tribal, racial lines because of extreme adherence of culture and the associated identity. Not only divided communities or societies but gird conflicts and turmoil as well.Many wars and other armed or unarmed conflicts have been fueled by peoples culture and identity versus culture of identity. Part Two Anthropological glasses on the topical anesthetic community Every where there are classes but the way they form somehow doesnt follow any blueprint. For instance in campus, students have identified themselves into various groups but some factors favor this kind of groupings. For example, smokers set themselves as soon as they join campus. But it is healthy that identification through color is no longer in existence but a meager percentage of students use it to identify themselves into groups or classes.Nonetheless, there are two or three groups of students that are clearly identified. Class or stratification factor has played part in their formations. These groups include the rich and the poor, those serious in class with their studies and those who are not serious then a few in class of white and black albeit very few identify to these grouping. But the most encouraging trend is that these groupings are not extreme, they are very neutral and they have been neutralized for the reason that there is a apportion of sharing right from the depositor y library to hostels and from class to the cafeteria.These make a very wide difference when comparing them with the groups which are discussed in the textbook, the text groupings tend to take an extremism dimension in their cultural setting which when compared to the local community or university are flexible and there is no remarkable degree of separation between the groups. In my observation this form of culture is very different because even ladies intermingle with gentlemen freely and there exists an aura of freedom for all and sundry.Finally institutions like universities and colleges have played an important role in connection to various cultures by manner of speaking these diversities to one main culture without force. For instance color segregation has been dealt with intellectually because there is a lot of sharing within and without class. Part Three Vital lessons in this course There are many lessons that I have learned throughout this cause. Some of these lessons inclu de the factors that have contributed to inequality and segregation and what has been done to counter this phenomenon.How stratification or class was born and how soon or later it will melt from society. Any form of identification may severely damage the conscious of some people regarding other cultures. Education can change ones culture for the better and for the worse if not both. The interest of learning a new culture also encourages the other people of different cultures to have the chirk up of learning something new but may depend on the expression of one party to the other. other lesson is how family, kinship and marriage are closely knit in society.As people are crossing borders and oceans for new adventures they are getting absorbed to other cultures and languages and their identity is no longer the same. Language has not been inclined the intensity it deserves in matters of any culture anywhere. Some people may not altogether go out their culture and language but they d o not practice, and gradually it disappears. Of course my argument must be clear that this tribal, clan and racial intermarriages are very positive towards promoting harmony anywhere in the world but the factor itself is harmful to the survival of some cultures and languages.And by assurance, this is causing a very yearning debate as already many cultures, languages, groups of people and tribes are disappearing or they are totally extinct. One other important lesson is the relationship between environment and man. Environment shapes culture and change in the environment alters the behavior and the living patterns of people thus culture in general. Environment is part in shaping mans culture and mans activities have been detrimental to the environment thusly cultural change. (Embers 2007)